Disaggregation
By gender
Network · 1,247 learners
Female
611 · 49%
Male
636 · 51%
Network parity index: 0.98 · Target: 1.00 by 2028.
Disaggregation
By sponsorship
Sponsored vs fee-paying
Sponsored
511 · 41%
Fee-paying
736 · 59%
Sponsored retention +1.8 pp above fee-paying. Strongest signal for donor ROI.
Disaggregation
By grade band
Pre-primary through upper primary
- Pre-Primary444retention 97.8%
- Lower Primary (P1–P3)526retention 96.1%
- Upper Primary (P4–P7)277retention 94.6%
Equity vs outcomes
Are we serving everyone well?
Mean outcome score (literacy + numeracy / 2) per cohort, per campus.
Sponsored and fee-paying cohorts are within ±2 points of each other at every campus. This is the strongest single piece of evidence that the Silverleaf model is equitable in outcomes, not just in access.
What stands out
Observations
Auto-generated · reviewed by MEL Lead
- Sponsored learners outperform on retention by +1.8ppSponsored cohort retention 97.2% vs fee-paying 95.4%. Suggests scholarship pipeline + family wraparound supports are working — re-affirm to philanthropic partners.
- Gender parity holding at 49% F / 51% MNetwork-wide within ±2pp of parity. Olasiti is lowest at 47% F — flag for community-engagement team in Q1 2027.
- Upper-primary retention dipping at 94.6%Three percentage-point drop from lower primary. Common pattern as families weigh secondary fees — strengthens the case for Secondary launch in 2028.
Full table
Equity & outcome by campus
One row per campus.
| Campus | % Female | % Sponsored | Sponsored outcome | Fee-paying outcome | Gap | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usa River | 51% | 38% | 80 | 80 | 0 | equitable |
| Arusha Modern | 49% | 43% | 77 | 76 | +1 | equitable |
| Kijenge | 48% | 41% | 75 | 76 | -1 | equitable |
| Ilboru | 50% | 45% | 71 | 70 | +1 | equitable |
| Boma | 47% | 46% | 69 | 68 | +1 | equitable |